OPEN logo Oregon Program Evaluators Network

Back to Events

Past Events & Event Resources

2008               2007               2006                2005                 2004                2003
 
 

Needs Assessment Workshop, Before You Start, and Beyond: The strategic importance of needs assessments for programs and services, and methods for implementation, April 11, 2008

This workshop demonstrated from soup to nuts considerations for each stage of a needs assessment. Well also reflect on the pros and cons of using internal resources vs. inviting an outside consultant. Attendees gained an understanding of the importance of a needs assessment and its relationship to planning as well as an understanding of methods for conducting a needs assessment. Specific Topics & Activities Included:

  • Why conduct a needs assessment?
  • The relationship to project planning and the difference between assessment and evaluation.
  • The essential question of needs assessment
  • Who are your participants?
  • Politics and other possible obstacles
  • The Needs Assessment Process: Data collection: preparation, logistics, resources needed
  • Data collection methods: interviews, focus groups, surveys
  • Analyzing your needs assessment data
  • Reporting your results and wrap up

SAS Skills Training: Introductory, Intermediate, and Advanced
, February 23, 25-27, 2008
Read the flyer with more information describing the workshops.
 
OPEN-Sponsored Brown Bag Discussion, Promoting Behavioral Change, January 10, 2008
Mike Riley presented on Promoting Behavioral Change. The discussion covered the use of research techniques for measuring public opinion and the steps necessary for impacting change. Key topics and case histories involve driving the adoption of environmentally responsible behavior will be discussed. This presentation was originally presented to the North Pacific Regional Conference of the Public Relations Society of America in San Francisco. Mike Riley is the Research Director of Riley Research (RileyResearch.com) and a graduate of Oregon State University. His background is in quantitative study design, and all phases and techniques of qualitative studies. Additionally, Mike is past-President of the Oregon Chapter of the American Marketing Association.

2007
OPEN-sponsored Brown Bag, Using Logic Models, November 15, 2007

The high utility of logic models was explored by facilitator Kari Greene.  Ms. Greene covered how to integrate logic model use into evaluation activities, and she shared some logic model examples, a logic model plan, and varied resources related to logic modeling. This brown bag was aimed at attendees with some logic model experience, and participants had the opportunity to share their own logic models and the challenges, successes and frustrations they have had using a logic modeling process. 

OPEN-sponsored Brown Bag with Michael Bamberger, September 27, 2007
RealWorld Evaluation: Conducting Evaluations under Real-World Budget, Time, Data and Political Constraints
This was one in a series of monthly brown bag discussions, organized by OPEN, aimed at providing a forum for the dissemination of evaluation tools and techniques. This was a no host lunch, and participants were encouraged to bring their lunches to this discussion.
Brown Bag Hand-out:Conducting Evaluations under Real-World Budget, Time, Data and Political Constraints
OPEN-sponsored Brown Bag, Understanding and influencing adolescents: 3 Common Mistakes, September 13, 2007
This was one in a series of monthly brown bag discussions, organized by OPEN, aimed at providing a forum for the dissemination of evaluation tools and techniques. This was a no host lunch, and participants were encouraged to bring their lunches to this discussion. Discussant Andrew Robinson presented methods for understanding and influencing adolescents. His primary focus is on optimizing the influence of adults in the lives of adolescents. Andrew notes, “I speak the language of program people but can serve as a translator between the researcher and the program. My role with clients is typically to help them prepare for evaluation and/or translate their evaluation results into actionable solutions. Too often research findings remain dormant and aren't used to make programs more effective.” Mr. Robinson currently works with organizations to optimize the effectiveness of their efforts to positively influence adolescents. His evaluation and monitoring services are designed to strengthen the connection between the people delivering the message and the adolescents receiving the message. Prior to starting his own evaluation group, Mr. Robinson was a Marriage and Family Therapist and a director of a nonprofit that worked with adolescents. More information about Mr. Robinson can be found at ARobinsonConsulting.com
OPEN poster session at the Healthier Communities through Action and Research conference, July 19, 2007

This conference is coordinated by the Northwest Health Foundation. OPEN collaborated on this conference, Northwest Health Foundation 3rd Community-Based Participatory Research Conference (CBPR), geared towards community organizations, academic research and teaching faculty, public health officials, funding organizations, and policy makers. This was the first time OPEN and the Northwest Health Foundation \collaborated, and this sponsorship allows OPEN to spotlight, honor and celebrate our local evaluators and researchers.

OPEN-sponsored student Happy Hour, July 10, 2007

At this Happy Hour at the Bridgeport Brewing Company, students learned about the opportunities for students to receive training as program evaluators and also network with other students and program evaluators in the community. In addition, students were provided with information about upcoming summer and fall events.

OPEN Brown Bag Presentation, July 12, 2007

During Presentations to Community-Based Stakeholders: Sharing Strategies that Work, discussant Tanya Ostrogorsky covered strategies used in communicating evaluation results to community stakeholders. She used her varied experiences at the Portland State University, Regional Research Institute, and her current work at the Oregon Health and Science University School of Nursing. Ms. Ostrogorsky encouraged attendees to bring samples of what has worked in their own evaluation settings for use in the discussion.

Portland SAS Users Group (PDXSUG)
Meeting, June 11, 2007
The annual PDXSUG Meeting was held in downtown Portland, located at the Standard Center Building. Along with two speakers, the event had door prizes (including SAS books) and information on upcoming SAS events. See Flyer

Introduction to OPEN and the Evaluation Field, May 15, 2007
An introduction to OPEN and to evaluation as a job field. This event was geared towards students and featured a variety of speakers sharing their career paths in evaluation. For this session, program evaluation was defined as the use of research to measure the effects of a program in terms of its goals, outcomes, or criteria.
Electronic Medical Records for Surveillance: The CDC Immunization Datalink Project, May 15, 2007
Brian Hazelhurst (of Kaiser) presented at Oregon Health and Sciences University.

SAS Training with Renu Gehring, May 10, 2007

Renu Gehring delivered a training session on SAS (a statistical database program). The training focused on SAS loops, functions and macroprocessing with examples from hospital discharge data. Ms. Gehring is Managing Partner at Ace-Cube, LLP, has an undergraduate degree in economics and history from Mount Holyoke College and a graduate degree in economics from Brown University. In addition to working for several economic, research and marketing consulting companies, she has worked for and consulted with corporations such as Fidelity Investments and Nike, Inc. Her key strengths include statistical analysis, economic valuation, as well as end-to-end management, analysis, and reporting of large and complicated data sets using SAS. Ms. Gehring is a SAS Certified Professional, with over 12 years programming experience.

Brown Bag: Portland-based Research Analysts, May 10, 2007

This event was cosponsored by the Oregon Public Health Association, Epidemiology- Biostatistics section. Portland is home to many public health research analysts and evaluators employed by varied governmental agencies, and this brown bag event will allow them to meet each other and learn more about the research conducted by their colleagues.
Brown Bag Luncheon on Independent Evaluation Consulting, March 15, 2007
Independent Evaluation Consulting was the topic of the fall 2006 issue of New Directions for Evaluation, a journal of the American Evaluation Association. OPEN is one of the oldest affiliates of the American Evaluation Association. At the brown bag, consultants had the chance to meet each other at an informal setting. Attendees enjoyed lunch while making contacts and learning about the work of other local evaluation consultants.
Related links: American Evaluation Association and American Evaluation Association New Directions for Evaluation
What is Evaluation?, March 14, 2007
The annual student event at Portland State University was geared towards students, and featured a variety of speakers sharing their career paths in evaluation. For this event, program evaluation was defined as the use of research to measure the effects of a program in terms of its goals, outcomes, or criteria.
The Oregon Health Policy and Research Collaborative (OHREC) March meeting theme of evaluating the safety net, March 13, 2007
Rachel Gold, PhD, MPH (Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, formerly of OHSU Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine) presented: Conducting Research in the OCHIN Practice Management Data: Opportunities and Examples.
Robert A. Lowe, MD,MPH ( OHSU Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine) presented: What Does Emergency Department Data Tell Us About the Safety Net? The Canary in the Coal Mine.

2006

OPEN hosted the American Evaluation Association annual conference, Evaluation 2006: The Consequences of Evaluation, in Portland October 30-November 5, 2006

OPEN/SAMHSA Diversity/Cultural Competency Workshop: Improving the Quality of Culturally Competent Evaluation in Federal Health and Human Services Grant Programs, Portland State University, September 8, 2006
Dr. James Herrell and colleagues from the US DHHS Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) discussed the criteria SAMHSA uses to assess proposals for evaluations involving culturally diverse populations, including recent changes in these criteria such as greater emphasis on standard data collection, with possible implications for local evaluations. The discussion addressed topics including the approaches SAMHSA has found to be most effective, challenges in assuring appropriate protection of human subjects from diverse populations, and navigating the Institutional Review Board process. The teleconference presentation by SAMHSA was followed by questions and open discussion.
Current Topics in Statistics for Applied Researchers Workshop July 17-20, 2006
The School of Nursing at Oregon Health & Science University designed and hosted a workshop for researchers interested in updating and improving their statistical knowledge in order to strengthen the design and analyses of their research.
Mid-Valley Workshop Brownbag, May 25, 2006

The OPEN Mid-Valley Cluster, in cooperation with the University of Oregon Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior, hosted "Conducting evaluations with budget, time and data constraints: Doing the best you can with available resources, " with Michael Bamberger Ph.D. at the University of Oregon, 901 East 18th Avenue in Eugene.

Effect Size and Power Analysis, May 23, 2006
Dr. Nancy Perrin, statistician and professor at Oregon Health and Sciences University, presents a two-hour workshop for evaluators and researchers. The workshop focuses on how many times you may have written a sentence like, "Although program participants performed better than the control group, the difference was not statistically significant." Perhaps, you needed a sample size four times larger and did not realize it. A member of the Program Committee, Michael Bamberger, recently pointed out that many evaluations are doomed from the start, if the criterion is statistical significance, because it is impossible for the results to show such a difference given the sample size.
Social Event, May 23, 2006
Meet for a social and networking opportunity following Nancy Perrin's workshop! Light refreshments and cash bar provided. Parking is available behind the Pub, in the parking garage opposite the Multnomah Building, or on the street. We will have available, for your comments and suggestions, copies of a draft resource document: "Networking Information on Evaluation Resources in Oregon and the Northwest". If you are unable to attend the presentation by Nancy Perrin, but would like to take advantage of this opportunity to network with fellow evaluators, we'll meet you at the Lucky Lab.

Annual OPEN Student Event, "Program Evaluation 101: What You Need to Know," May 11, 2006
Event Resources: Annotated Evaluation Reading List and Online Resource Guide, Portland State University
2005